Vacation packages: protection, not price

Book vacation packages

ExpediaFlight and hotel priced together on one booking. Expedia is the organiser, holds the reservation and handles changes.Build a package on Expedia

Every link above leaves this site.

We are not an agent for any of these companies and we do not take bookings. The provider you choose handles payment, confirmation, changes and refunds. What that means in practice.

Flight-and-hotel bundles are sold on price, and price is rarely the reason to buy one. The reason is that a package, in the legal sense, carries a set of rights that the same three bookings made separately do not have. The most valuable of them is that one company becomes responsible for the entire trip, including the parts other companies were supposed to deliver.

Whether a booking is a package is decided by the structure of the sale, not by the word on the confirmation email. Under the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018 a package is a combination of at least two different types of travel service for the same trip, and the Regulations recognise four types:

Carriage of passengers — the flight, the train, the coach.
Accommodation, provided it is not intrinsically part of the carriage and is not for residential purposes.
Rental of cars, other motor vehicles or motorcycles.
Any other tourist service not intrinsically part of the three above.

Two different types is the whole test. Flight plus hotel qualifies, flight plus car hire qualifies, hotel plus car hire qualifies. Two flights do not, because carriage of passengers is a single type however many legs you buy.

What makes a booking a package is the structure of the sale

Regulation 2(5) sets out six routes in. The first is the obvious one: the services are combined by a single trader before a single contract is concluded — and that expressly includes a combination the traveller selected themselves, which is why a dynamically built bundle is usually still a package. The other five turn on how the sale was run. The services were purchased from a single point of sale and selected before the traveller agrees to pay; or they were “offered, sold or charged at an inclusive or total price”; or they were advertised or sold under the term “package” or something similar; or they were chosen from a pre-paid selection; or they were bought through linked online booking processes.

That last route runs on a clock. Where the first trader transmits your name, payment details and email address to the second, and the second contract is concluded within 24 hours of the first booking being confirmed, the two bookings are one package. The Department for Business and Trade’s own worked example is a flight booked with an online travel agent, followed by a link in a confirmation email where “the car hire is booked without them needing to re-enter their trip dates or payment details”. That is a package. An identical-looking journey inside the same 24 hours is only a linked travel arrangement if those details were never transmitted across.

None of it depends on what the seller calls it. Regulation 30 states that a declaration that a trader acts “exclusively as an intermediary”, or that the sale is not a package, does not absolve it of the obligations the Regulations impose, and that a traveller may not waive rights granted by them. Terms and conditions cannot shrink the protection; they can only fail to mention it.

Some combinations fall outside. A tour, a show or an excursion added to a flight is disregarded where it does not account for a significant proportion of the value of the combination and is not advertised as, and does not otherwise represent, an essential feature of it — or where it is selected and bought only after travel has already started. The revised EU Directive will replace that judgement with a hard threshold of 25% of the value of the combination. And the Regulations do not apply at all to trips of less than 24 hours with no overnight accommodation, to occasional not-for-profit arrangements for a limited group, or to anything bought under a general agreement — which is how most corporate travel is contracted.

The right worth having: one company answerable for the whole trip

Regulation 15 is implied as a term into every package travel contract, and it says the organiser “is liable to the traveller for the performance of the travel services included in the package travel contract, irrespective of whether those services are to be performed by the organiser or by other travel service providers”. Assemble the same trip yourself and you hold three contracts with three companies, each answerable for its own part and none answerable for the trip. That is the difference, and it is worth more than most of what the brochure is arguing about.

The practical consequences follow from it. Where the organiser cannot provide a significant proportion of the services, it must offer suitable alternative arrangements at no extra cost, of equivalent or higher quality where possible. If unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances stop it returning you home as agreed, it bears the cost of necessary accommodation, of equivalent category where possible, for up to 3 nights per traveller. That cap does not apply to people with reduced mobility and their companions, to pregnant women, to unaccompanied minors or to anyone needing specific medical assistance, provided the organiser was told at least 48 hours before the package began — a reason to declare those needs at booking rather than at the airport.

A contract may cap the organiser’s compensation, but the floor is statutory: never less than three times the total price of the package, and no cap may ever apply to personal injury or to damage caused intentionally or with negligence.

Before the contract is concluded, 17 categories of information in Schedule 1 must be provided, among them the total price, the payment timetable, passport, visa and health requirements, the minimum number of travellers needed for the trip to run, and the termination fees that will apply. Failing to provide them is an offence by the organiser and, where a retailer sold the package, by the retailer too. Separately, the seller must hand over a prescribed key rights statement in fixed statutory wording confirming that the booking “is a package” and naming the company that will be “fully responsible for the proper performance of the package as a whole”. If no such statement ever arrives, that is the first thing to ask about.

That information is not marketing. Regulation 6 makes it an integral part of the contract, unalterable unless the traveller expressly agrees, and where fees, charges or other costs were not disclosed before the contract was concluded, the traveller is not required to bear them. Two further terms are worth locating before a deposit leaves your account: the contract must name the entity in charge of the insolvency protection with its contact details including a geographical address, and give a contact point that lets you reach the organiser quickly while travelling.

Packages are not automatically cheaper, and the price can still move

The inclusive price is a statutory limb, not a courtesy. Being “offered, sold or charged at an inclusive or total price” is itself one of the things that turns a bundle into a package, and nothing requires the seller to break out what the flight cost and what the room cost. That is exactly what allows an operator to pass on rates it has contracted below public rates — and exactly what makes a bad bundle hard to spot. The American rule mirrors it: 14 CFR 399.84 requires a tour, defined as a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations, to be advertised at the entire price the customer will pay, with no duty to itemise. Comparing a package against its separately booked equivalent is structurally difficult on both sides of the Atlantic, which is a reason to do the comparison yourself rather than trust the saving claimed.

Once booked, the price can only rise if the contract clears four conditions: it expressly reserves the right; it limits increases to three specified cost categories — fuel or other power for carrying passengers, taxes or fees imposed by third parties such as tourist taxes, landing taxes and embarkation or disembarkation fees, and exchange rates; it gives the traveller a matching right to a price reduction; and it states how revisions are calculated. A surcharge clause missing any one of the four does not meet the regulation.

Then the limits bite. No increase of any size may be made later than 20 days before the start of the package, and any increase must arrive with a justification and a calculation on a durable medium. Where an increase exceeds 8% of the total price, you may terminate without paying a fee or take a substitute package, with a price reduction if the substitute is of lower quality or cost, and everything paid must be refunded within 14 days. ABTA members are held to more than the law requires: under the Code of Conduct they must absorb an amount equal to 2% of the original holiday cost before passing on any surcharge, and the 8% trigger is measured after that 2% has been absorbed.

The right runs in both directions. Where the contract reserves the right to increase the price, the traveller has a corresponding right to a reduction if those fuel, third-party tax or exchange-rate costs fall before departure. The organiser may deduct administrative expenses from the refund, but must produce proof of them if asked.

One thing the Regulations do not do is cap the deposit. Schedule 1 requires the seller to state the total price inclusive of taxes and, where applicable, all additional fees, charges and other costs, plus any amount or percentage payable as a down payment and the timetable for paying the balance. It is a disclosure duty with no ceiling on either figure, and the revised EU Directive does not change that — its recital 12 records expressly that it lays down no rules limiting down payments or regulating when the balance falls due.

What a package costs you in flexibility, and when to say no

Protection is bought with commitment. You may terminate at any time before the start of the package, but you may be charged an appropriate and justifiable termination fee. Standardised cancellation scales are permitted only where they are based on the timing of the cancellation and on the organiser’s expected cost savings and income from deploying the services elsewhere, and the organiser must justify the amount if you ask for it. Where the contract states no scale at all, the fee is capped by formula: the price of the package minus the cost savings minus the income from alternative deployment of the services.

The offsetting advantage is one most travellers never use. A package is not name-locked the way an airline ticket is. Regulation 9 gives a statutory right to transfer the contract to someone who satisfies all the conditions applying to it, on reasonable notice given on a durable medium, and notice of 7 days or more before the start is always deemed reasonable. The fee for transferring must not be unreasonable and must not exceed the cost the organiser actually incurs, with proof provided; transferor and transferee are jointly and severally liable for it. If plans collapse and somebody else can go, that is usually cheaper than cancelling.

The organiser has exits of its own. It may cancel outright where fewer people book than the minimum number stated in the contract, giving a full refund and no additional compensation, provided it gives notice of 20 days for trips lasting more than 6 days, 7 days for trips of 2 to 6 days, or 48 hours for trips under 2 days. ABTA members accept a tighter brake than the statute imposes: no cancellation after the balance due date except for unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances, the client’s own default on the balance, or failure to reach those minimum numbers.

Where the organiser significantly alters a main characteristic of the trip before departure, it cannot simply impose the change. You may accept it or terminate without paying a termination fee, with a substitute package offered and a price reduction if the substitute is of lower quality or cost. If you do not respond, the organiser must notify you a second time before it can terminate, and must refund within 14 days. Every pre-departure refund under these rules carries the same statutory deadline: 14 days from termination, not a service target.

The much-quoted right to walk away free of charge is real but narrow. It applies where unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances at the destination or its immediate vicinity significantly affect the package or the carriage to it, and it buys a full refund but no additional compensation. The test is objective — a situation beyond the control of the party relying on it, whose consequences “could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken” — and it is not satisfied by having gone off a destination.

So there are trips a package is simply wrong for. If the dates are likely to move, moving them costs a termination fee and a fresh booking rather than an amendment. If the point of the trip is one particular hotel, one particular cabin or a flight you intend to buy with an airline’s own points, a bundle can only get in the way. If you are booking under a corporate framework contract, the Regulations do not apply to it at all. A package earns its keep when the trip has several parts that must interlock, when the money at stake would hurt to lose, or when the organiser’s failure would leave you stranded. It earns very little on a two-night trip you could rebook yourself in ten minutes.

Linked travel arrangements: the lookalike, and its expiry date

A linked travel arrangement is the weaker category, and a great many online bundles fall into it. It is two or more types of travel service for the same trip, bought under separate contracts with the individual providers, where a trader either facilitates the separate selection and separate payment of each service during a single visit to its point of sale, or facilitates in a targeted manner the booking of a further service from another trader within 24 hours. One basket and one total price points to a package; two payments points to a linked travel arrangement.

The gap between the two is written into the statute. A trader selling one must state clearly and prominently that the traveller “will not benefit from any of the rights applying exclusively to packages” and that each service provider is solely responsible for its own service. The prescribed wording contains the line most people skim: the insolvency protection attached to a linked travel arrangement “does not provide a refund in the event of the insolvency of the relevant service provider”. It protects you against the failure of the trader that arranged the booking, not against the failure of the airline or the hotel.

There is a fallback almost nobody is told about. Where the trader facilitating a linked travel arrangement fails to comply with regulation 26 — the prescribed wording, the notice, the insolvency protection — the package rights in regulations 9 and 12 to 14 and in Part 4 apply to the travel services in the arrangement anyway. If no warning ever appeared, the working assumption should be that you have package rights, not that you have none.

The whole category is being abolished. The Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements (Amendment) Regulations 2026 were made on 22 April 2026 and come into force on 6 April 2027. They omit regulation 26 and Schedules 6 to 10 and fold the first kind of linked travel arrangement into the definition of a package, so a single visit to one trader’s point of sale where you separately select and separately pay for each service becomes a full package. Contracts entered into before the commencement date are unaffected. The same instrument inserts a new regulation 29A requiring a third party that fails to provide part of a package to refund the organiser within 14 days — a business-to-business deadline designed to make the organiser’s own 14-day duty to you survivable.

The EU is doing the same thing on a slower clock. Directive (EU) 2026/1024 was adopted on 29 April 2026 and published in the Official Journal on 8 May 2026, but member states have until 29 September 2028 to transpose it and must apply the measures only from 29 March 2029. It deletes linked travel arrangements outright and replaces them with a trap for traders: where a trader invites you to add a second type of travel service, fails to give the required information, and you agree to pay for it at the same point of sale within 24 hours, the services “shall constitute a package, and the trader shall be deemed to be the organiser”. Until then an EU traveller’s rights come from their own country’s transposition of the 2015 Directive, applicable since 1 July 2018, which carries the same architecture as the UK version — the same 7-day transfer notice, the same 8% threshold, the same 20-day cut-off, the same 24-hour test, the same 14-day refund. The revision also puts an outer limit on insolvency payouts for the first time: refunds no later than six months after the necessary documents are submitted, nine in exceptional and duly justified cases.

ATOL, insolvency cover, and what exists outside the UK and EU

ATOL is a licensing mechanism, not a right, and that distinction explains most of the confusion around it. The 2012 ATOL Regulations make it unlawful to make flight accommodation available in the UK unless you are the operator of the aircraft, an ATOL holder acting within its licence, or exempt — and an airline ticket agent is exempt “except when making available flight accommodation which constitutes a component of a package”. That one clause is why the identical seat is ATOL protected inside a package and not when bought on its own. The CAA states the consumer version plainly: where you buy a flight and receive a valid e-ticket in exchange for payment, the scheme does not cover it.

The certificate is the proof, and it is due the moment money changes hands — including a deposit, not at final payment or at ticketing. There are three versions, Package (Single Contract), Package (Multi Contract) and Flight-only, so the certificate itself tells you which regime the booking sits in. Supplying one for a booking that does not require it is a breach in its own right rather than a bonus. Separately, at the point of sale the seller must tell you who is accepting the payment, in what capacity they are making the flight accommodation available, and the name and ATOL number of the ATOL holder behind it. A firm that will not answer that is withholding something the law requires it to volunteer. Check the number against the register rather than trusting the logo: genuine ones are four or five digits and may begin with a T.

ATOL covers the travel company’s financial failure and nothing else. You cannot claim on it for cancellations, complaints, sickness, injury or substandard hygiene; accommodation-only bookings are outside it because they include no flight; and where a flight inside an ATOL package is cancelled, delayed or amended while the company is still trading, the scheme sends you back to the company you booked with — which is consistent, because regulation 15 already makes that company liable for the performance of every service in the package. Claims must reach the CAA within 12 months of the failure. Behind all of it, regulation 19 requires every UK-established organiser to hold effective security covering both refunds and repatriation, benefiting travellers regardless of where they live, where they departed from or where the package was sold, with the repatriation element provided free of charge.

Packages without a flight sit outside ATOL entirely. ABTA sets out the three alternatives: a bond lodged with ABTA or another body approved by the Department for Business and Trade, a financial failure insurance policy, or a trust account. ABTA also states the counterpoint bluntly — flights booked direct with airlines are not protected by any scheme of financial protection. A second line of defence works whether or not the trip is a package: section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 makes the card issuer jointly and severally liable with the supplier for misrepresentation or breach of contract where the cash price of the item is over £100 and not more than £30,000.

The United States has no federal equivalent of any of this. The nearest analogue, the Department of Transportation’s Public Charter rules in 14 CFR Part 380, applies only to Public Charter air transportation — not to the flight-plus-hotel bundles sold on scheduled seats, which is how almost every American vacation package is assembled. Where those rules do apply they are strong: a major change means a different departure or return date, a different origin or destination city, a hotel substituted for one not named in the contract, or an aggregate price increase of more than 10% made 10 or more days out, with no increase at all permitted inside 10 days. The operator must notify a known major change within 7 days and at least 10 days before departure, the participant then has 7 days to cancel, and the refund follows within 14 days. A participant who supplies a substitute traveller gets a full refund less an administrative fee capped at $25.

Outside charters, what an American buyer gets is piecemeal and mostly aimed at the flight. A significantly changed flight — departing or arriving 3 hours or more off schedule domestically, 6 hours internationally, or with a different airport, an added connection, a downgrade or a lost accessibility feature — refunds the airfare, and nothing in it forces a refund of the hotel; the DOT reaffirmed those thresholds in December 2025. Ticket agents must refund promptly when service cannot be performed as contracted, which means 7 business days for credit card purchases and 20 calendar days for other payment methods. The FTC’s fee rule, in force since 12 May 2025, forces mandatory resort and cleaning fees into the up-front total for short-term lodging and live-event tickets, including when sold by travel agents — but airfare is not a covered category, so the hotel half of an American package is covered and the flight half is not.

In place of a national scheme there is a state patchwork. California requires sellers of travel to register and display the number while stating that registration “does not constitute approval by the State of California”, requires 100% of sums received to be deposited into a trust account, caps its Travel Consumer Restitution Fund at $15,000 per person aggrieved and only for claimants who were in California at the time of sale, and gives sellers 30 days to refund payments for services not provided — against 14 in the UK and the EU. Florida takes annual registration, a $300 fee and a surety bond of up to $25,000, or $50,000 for sellers of vacation certificates. Washington requires trust accounting for any sum held more than five business days. None of it makes one company answerable for the trip as a whole.

Common questions

Is a package cheaper than booking the flight and hotel separately?

Not automatically, and the way packages are sold makes that hard to check. Being offered, sold or charged at an inclusive or total price is one of the statutory routes into being a package, and no rule requires the seller to break out what the flight or the room cost. That is what lets an operator pass on rates contracted below public ones, and equally what hides a poor deal; the American full-fare rule works the same way for tours. Price your own assembled version on the same dates, board basis and baggage allowance before deciding, and treat the protection rather than the saving as the reason to buy.

I booked a flight and then clicked through to a hotel. Is that a package?

It depends on whether your details travelled with you. If the first trader transmitted your name, payment details and email address to the second, and the second contract was concluded within 24 hours of the first booking being confirmed, it is a full package. If the second booking was merely facilitated in a targeted manner inside the same 24 hours, without that data transfer, it is a linked travel arrangement with much weaker rights. Beware the transatlantic name collision: the American 24-hour rule is something else entirely — an airline obligation to hold or cancel a reservation made 7 or more days before departure.

Does ATOL cover a delayed flight or a hotel that is nothing like the photographs?

No. ATOL is financial protection against the travel company’s failure, and the CAA says so explicitly: you cannot claim for cancellations, complaints, sickness, injury or substandard hygiene during your holiday. Where the flight inside an ATOL package is cancelled or amended while the company is still trading, the scheme directs you back to the company you booked with — which is where the real remedy sits anyway, since regulation 15 makes that company liable for the performance of every service in the package. Claims against a company that has actually failed must reach the CAA within 12 months of the failure.

Can I cancel a package if I change my mind?

Yes, at any time before the start of the package — but you can be charged an appropriate and justifiable termination fee, and the organiser must justify the amount if you ask. Where the contract sets no standard scale, the fee is capped at the price of the package minus the organiser’s cost savings and its income from deploying the services elsewhere. Cancelling with no fee at all is confined to unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances at the destination or its immediate vicinity that significantly affect the trip, and that test is objective rather than a matter of how you feel about going. Transferring the booking to somebody else, with at least 7 days’ notice, is often the cheaper move.

Sources

Rules, thresholds and protections on this page were checked against these sources on 11 September 2026. Regulators amend them without notice — confirm anything you are relying on against the source itself.

Vacation Packages